 | |
|
Sponsor |  lovingpoet | Mar 24, 1:17am | Interesting, though...I would like to hear more background information on the legend that is eluded to so often in the clip. Also, the scientific team that studied the skull now in Canada, it would be nice to read their findings, rather than hear them second hand.
Does anyone have more on this? |
|
|
| |
|
Sponsor | | lovingpoet | Mar 25, 3:07am | Sketchy, and I think the wikipedia page shows how one sided the video was. Yet it also seems conflicted, so it is easy to see how the makers of the clip you provided might choose to follow the more mystical story line.
If it is true that the skull was hand made over hundreds of years, that is extrodinary enough...in my opinion. |
|
|
Sponsor | | digits | Mar 25, 10:10am | I never knew of crystal skulls. Thanks for letting me see that video. I'm off to read the Wikipedia article now.
I agree with Loving Poet. They keep speaking of this *legend* but I've never heard of it before this video. [Which I find odd.] I also find it remarkable enough that the skull was handmade over hundreds [thousands] of years ago?
I will say this though...pertaining to the video: This is only my opinion. I think it is so very self-absorbed of this society [our civilization] to continually insist this is the *most advanced* this earth has ever been. Really. Really? I mean really.
I can understand that lacking other proof we would arrive at that conclusion as a possibility but so often I hear *that* as the assumption. Well. If that IS the assumption, no wonder Stonehenge, the pyramids and other mysteries remain *mysteries.* However, if that assumption could get relegated to "theory" then perhaps these *mysteries* could teach *us* something.
I just find it hard to believe that for this short time of our written civilization...which is so very short...that people continue to assume this is the most advanced people have ever been. [Yet we still believe in war at achieving "peace?"] Good god. |
|
|
Sponsor | | lovingpoet | Mar 26, 10:57am | 5) A similar thought in a bit of a different direction from another thread in this group:
unexplained.group.stumbleupon.com/forum/87811/2/ [unexplained.group.stumbleupon.com/forum/87811/2/]
There was a show on recently that discussed what the earth would be like "after humans". The one thing that stood out to me, is the fact that nature would take back what we currently hold. And no matter how well built a structure/infastructure or monument, it would eventually cease to exsist with telling signs of "who and when". So it is indeed foolish to asume we are the most advanced this planet has ever been. |
|
|
|
You need to Sign-up for StumbleUpon to post to this forum
|
The Unexplained → Discussion
3807889